User:Abd/Wikipediocracy/Sucks is circling the drain at this point - 4

From Wikitop
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1 2 3 4 5 6 Page 4, original URL: (members only)


Contents

Post by Katie » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:37 pm

Abd also spent some time on Commons defending Meco (T-C-L), who proudly admitted to running a website for trading child pornography in the 1990's, as this post by myself shows: link.

In the first Commons link, here: link, he said, about Meco, that "there is no clue there that he is a pedophile, but anti-pedophile vigilantes often confuse w:hebephilia and w:ephebophilia with w:pedophilia." He then went on to say that "ephebophilia is quite common, even normal. Obviously, acting upon ephebophilic urges can be very illegal, which varies from place to place."

I wasn't aware that lusting after teenage girls when one is a grown man is normal, but it seems Abd thinks he knows better than actual experts in this subject area.

Post by Katie » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:17 pm

By the way, speaking of Eric Barbour, in 2015 he made a post that referred to Dennis Hastert's sexual abuse of a teenage boy as "sexual relations", just when the scandal was breaking, the post is here: link. He also wondered if his career should really be over because of the New York Times report about what he did. I agree with Vigilant's first post in the thread about Hastert: link.

Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:41 pm

The newest article posted into r/wikipedia
List_of_youngest_birth_mothers (T-H-L)
You can't make this shit up.
Edit:
The talk page is particularly vile
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =897024848
A whole section on why 12 year olds are 'too old' to be included.
Everyone who has ever posted to that article or talk page should get the Eye of Sauron.

Post by Vigilant » Mon Feb 17, 2020 11:38 am

lol
... totally doing fine after being found as as a professional pedophile beard ...
... just ... fine ...
Reminds me of this
video Clouseau interrogates the staff.

Post by Vigilant » Mon Feb 17, 2020 1:39 pm

Yet another thread for Abd to whine in.
At what point will it be too ridiculous even for sucks?
A pedophile beard who starts a dozen threads about his butthurt.
rotfl:
Wikipedia might not be therapy, but sucks certainly is.
Do any of them ever get better?

Post by Vigilant » Mon Feb 17, 2020 3:44 pm

Another fart in a whirlwind.
All anyone hears from his screeds.
video, woman tearfully pleads "Leave Britney alone"

Post by Vigilant » Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:40 pm

More moaning from the perennial turd.
The difference is that Tim's a real person, not the gibbering caricature of a late stage syphilitic macaque like you, Dennis.
I like Tim.
We may disagree, but that's ok.
We may even hector each other about the other's stance on some topic.
I'd have a beer anytime with Tim.
But you, Dennis, you're out there with the garbage.
I wouldn't cross the street to piss on you if you were on fire.
You will die alone and nobody will mark your passing with anything other than relief.

Post by Vigilant » Mon Feb 17, 2020 7:46 pm

Fruedian slip of the century!!
Aphid Ball Delicatessen wrote:
When sane people walk away, what is left is trolls and a subset of humanity that is inured to trolling, so common is it in some contexts. That subset is not enough for the diversity necessary for healthy community.
Oh Dennis, it's you who's the troll.
You've been blocked on a bunch of places for trolling.
You're the globally banned one from all WMF properties.
You're banned from ratwiki.
You're banned from ED.
You're banned from WO.
That you can't see that you're the filthy troll nobody can stand just makes this all so much more hilarious.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 18, 2020 12:46 pm

"Evil!!", screeches the pedophile enabler.
:rotfl:
Witchsmeller pursuivant is a character from the Black Adder comedy series and my choosing that tagline for my account is self-deprecating, but don't let me get in the way of your robust and furious five fingered knuckle shuffle session...
Helpful image for the less intellectually endowed at sucks.
image (of the Witchsmeller Pursuivant)
Back to your mysticism and numerology, Dennis! I'm sure they'll point the way to truth as quickly as any other RNG.
Jesus, you just can't make this stuff up.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:31 pm

Timely post from the WikiTextBot!
Witchsmeller Pursuivant
"Witchsmeller Pursuivant" is the fifth episode of the first series of the BBC sitcom Blackadder (The Black Adder). It is set in England in the :late 15th century and centres on the fictitious Prince Edmund, who finds himself falsely accused of witchcraft by a travelling witch hunter :known as the Witchsmeller Pursuivant. The story satirises mediaeval superstition and religious belief.
Academy Award-nominated actor Frank Finlay guest stars in this episode as the Witchsmeller, and Valentine Dyall appears in a cameo.
Even the bots are smarter than Abd!!
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Google results are affirm the same thing: Abd is an hysterical moron.

Post by Katie » Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:57 pm

Abd thinks that Dennis Hastert's sexual abuse of a high school student he was teaching was simply Hastert having "sexual relations" with a student according to this post by him here: link. Does the term "power imbalance" mean anything to him?
By the way, if I'm reading it properly, Abd seems to think it was a case without any victims at all, at least by him saying "He writes like that about other cases without actual victims". I somehow don't think any of the students Hastert molested, or their family members, or most people, would agree. And then he goes about smearing Vigilant by saying he doesn't care about actually protecting kids.

Post by Randy from Boise » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:02 pm

Katie wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:57 pm
[quoted in toto]
Some people just take a particularly wide stance in these matters.
RfB

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:07 pm

Randy from Boise wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:02 pm
Some people just take a particularly wide stance in these matters.
RfB
Tap, tap, tap...

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:14 pm

Katie wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:57 pm
[quoted in toto]
I've seen this type of behavior over and over since the dawn of the innertubes...
When you finally catch a slippery shitheel with something they did, they get EXACTLY this kind of defensive.
The deflection, the gaslighting, the whataboutism...
Not once had Abd said, "I absolutely do not support pedophilia or pedophiles, especially in venues with children."
Nor can he say, "I have never enabled pedophiles via my support."
These guys he's defending, that he's supported over the years, Larson, Tyciol, etc, I'd skin alive and use as a wetsuit, utterly without remorse, if I ever had to deal with them. I've coached for decades. I've been involved with court ordered child advocacy. I KNOW the damage these predators do. Shit that stays with and hurts these kids FOREVER.
Fuck them and fuck their enablers.
I suspect, strongly, that Abd has some extremely icky behavior is in history that he is attempting to hide.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:54 pm

Larson on Abd's wiki
Well, I was concerned that I could be experiencing an effect of aging, but later I chalked it up to having smoked too many cigarettes recently, being tired from having driven five hours to meet the chick, being with her for the first time and our not being used to each other, etc. because after waking up from Rapid Eye Movement a few days later it became evident there was nothing wrong with me physically. 69.244.230.1 15:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
What are the odds that Larson is confessing, in public, to an underage rape right here?

Post by Katie » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:38 pm

By the way, Larson edited Abd's previous wiki, beyondpolitics.org, as Yevgeny. I think Abd knew he was Larson, if nothing else, by the writing style and topics of interest. Also, both Abd and Larson describe their blogs, hosted on a wiki, as a "Bliki". The term isn't unique, but it's interesting these two both used the same terms.

Post by Randy from Boise » Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:50 pm

Vigilant wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:14 pm
These guys he's defending, that he's supported over the years, Larson, Tyciol, etc, I'd skin alive and use as a wetsuit, utterly without remorse, if I ever had to deal with them.
It rubs the SnoSeal on the skin, or else it gets the hose again...
image of Snoseal jar.

Post by Vigilant » Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:08 am

Post by Vigilant » Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:35 am

Post by Moral Hazard » Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:51 am

Vigilant wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:07 pm
[quoted in toto]
video 2nd Most Common Flaw In Baseball Swing - Narrow Feet [relevance obscure].
video Boxing | The importance of The Wide stance {vital information } [relevance obscure].

Post by Vigilant » Thu Feb 20, 2020 10:28 am

I don't understand actual human behavior. It is a mystery why people do things.
How many of these traits does Abd exemplify?
video 14 Signs of Narcissism

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 21, 2020 2:48 pm

Aaaaand we've gone full Godwin
Who are those people? In the budding Nazi Germany, they were the ordinary people who stood by while others were harassed and worse. And yes, life tests us. They were also the non-Nazi activists, often "good people" with "good ideas" who fought each other instead of cooperating to crucial ends, and this all is relevant to present U.S. politics. Hitler was elected because of majority failure, because not only of defective election methods (quite the same as we have in the U.S.) but because of failure to cooperate to unite against genuine evil, i.e., hatred, populist poison.
In our field, they are the ordinary wiki users who step aside and pay no attention to central process and abuse, because they can work in their own areas of interest. They think, -- until the jackboots come for them, and there is nobody left to defend them, because anyone who defends (pointing to fact) has been attacked, not defended, and banned. Sure, dramatic. But quite realistic as well.
Wow.
Me mocking your idiocy is totally the same as the brown shirts coming to take you away int he middle of the night.
Let's play a game called match the symptoms to Dennis' behavior.

  • Grandiosity with expectations of superior treatment from other people
  • Continually demeaning, bullying and belittling others
  • Exploiting others to achieve personal gain
  • Lack of empathy for the negative impact they have on the feelings, wishes, and needs of other people
  • Fixation on fantasies of power, success, intelligence, attractiveness, etc.
  • Self-perception of being unique, superior, and associated with high-status people and institutions
  • Need for continual admiration from others
  • Sense of entitlement to special treatment and to obedience from others
  • Intense envy of others, and the belief that others are equally envious of them

Feynman, *cough* *cough* wrote:
People with NPD exaggerate their skills and accomplishments, and their degree of intimacy with people they consider high-status.

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 21, 2020 4:56 pm

Such a sense of personal superiority may cause them to monopolize conversations, or to become impatient and disdainful when other persons talk about themselves.
On the other hand, if it makes you happy, Strelnokov, that's nice. We want our admins happy. Very interesting story! Yay, Strelnikov! now, where were we ... oh, yeah, that mess. Well I won't mention it here. Not at all. No sirree! Not me!

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 21, 2020 4:59 pm

People with NPD exaggerate their skills and accomplishments, and their degree of intimacy with people they consider high-status. Such a sense of personal superiority may cause them to monopolize conversations
Not unless it was oversighted and scrubbed from the deletion log, which is unlikely. To answer the question in this topic, probably not. But it is not impossible, more likely a staffer might, or any other supporter. I'd consider that normal on Wikipedia, happens all the time. If there is a problem, it would be from lack of attention. The whole insanity about paid editing was based on the structure being unreliable. Otherwise, one would want to see professional editors working on articles!
I argued on WP that experts should be declared COI. Which was ridiculed because, to them, COI meant Block As Soon As Discovered. But it would really mean that articles should be reliably sourced, and discussed by people who actually know the topic. So COI editors would only be strongly prevented from editing in a controversial way, but COI people tend to know sources and what sources mean better than the average editor. But regular editors should approach any COI ideas with skepticism. Prove it with reliable sources! Prove to whom? Neutral editors without an axe to grind. Wikipedia could have become reliable with reliable structure.
The realpolitik of Wikipedia is that the community is not trusted to reliably field POV pushing, so better block anyone with a POV. I.e., all experts, if one were fair! Damn experts tend to be opinionated! And of course, common editor opinion is not even recognized as POV. It's just "normal."
Looking at the contributions of Pete Streeling, looks to me like someone who might know Buttigieg, or is simply local to him. Perhaps went to the same high school or college.
This is all tempest in a teapot, all based on the idea that someone editing with a conflict of interest is only somewhat better than tossing babies out the window. Compare an editor who loves a candidate (whether or not employed or being a friend -- which also technically creates COI) with one who hates the candidate. Does the latter have a COI? I have never seen that claimed, but it would be just as damaging to Wikipedia process.
Why all this fuss about Buttigeig and Wikipedia? It's obvious. Politics. Searching for mud to toss. Everything that is worthy of disgust about politics. Don't buy it! Yes, if the campaign is lying, that would be a moral issue, of some weight, but look at the effing context! (And "it's the cover-up, stupid." Is Buttigeig stupid? Really? If I were advising them, and Streeling actually was working for the campaign, I'd recommend admitting it ASAP, without hesitation, and dealing with the reality. Most people would think "so effing what?") But "lied" can have legs, if there is a basis, but there is no basis here but a pile of semblances with a far more obvious explanation.
"Pete Streeling" is likely an alias. The last name is at least rare if not absent entirely. But Wikipedia encourages this (one of the unnecessary original Bad Ideas that had a purpose that could have been handled without all the insanities. Quora does very well requiring real name accounts. Wikipedia could have required real name accounts allowing limited privileges for IP editing. I.e, anonymous whistleblowers can blow the whistle, but cannot participate in decision-making other than like any anonymous phone caller and the police. (And in certain special cases, anonymous accounts might be allowed -- with supervision!)
In response to a single sentence.

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 21, 2020 5:01 pm

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 21, 2020 5:03 pm

Because their fragile egos are hypersensitive to perceived criticism or defeat, people with NPD are prone to feelings of shame, humiliation, and worthlessness over minor incidents of daily life and imagined, personal slights, and usually mask such feelings from people, either by way of feigned humility, or by socially isolating themselves, or by responding with outbursts of rage and defiance, or by seeking revenge.

Post by Giraffe Stapler » Fri Feb 21, 2020 6:02 pm

Abd wrote:
"Pete Streeling" is likely an alias. The last name is at least rare if not absent entirely. But Wikipedia encourages this (one of the unnecessary original Bad Ideas that had a purpose that could have been handled without all the insanities. Quora does very well requiring real name accounts.
Wow, that guy is dense. First of all, no one was called "Pete Streeling". The account name was just Streeling (T-C-L). No "Pete" and no reason to assume it's a surname. Second, the article in Slate actually identifies the person behind the account.
Slate wrote:
Googling the username will lead you to a college message board where, in 2006, Neehar Garg of South Bend, Indiana, posted his AOL Instant Messenger handle: Hanumang06. I reached out to Garg, who declined to talk on the phone but did confirm that he was Hanumang06 and, several emails later, also claimed ownership of the Streeling account, which was created the day after Hanumang06’s last recorded edit.
Third, I had a Quora account. It wasn't in my real name.

Post by TotalWar » Sat Feb 22, 2020 11:09 am

Emil Kirkegaard - who Lomax is defending on Wikipedia Sucks - has now been ordered to pay me back a large sum of my legal fees, £13,500 after losing a preliminary judgement in the lawsuit he filed against me (on-top of this I also have a good chance of getting back an additional £2000 since after losing the preliminary judgement, Kirkegaard's lawyer/barrister failed to show up at another hearing).
Totally humiliated and upset his friend Kirkegaard has to pay me back thousands, Lomax has resorted to framing me for things I've never done on Wikipedia Sucks:
The topic is really the lawsuit filed by Emil Kirkegaard against Oliver D. Smith, who started the Reddit thread.
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 519#p17519
- I never created the Kirkegaard thread(s) on Reddit. They were mostly posted in some SJW/Antifa sections which doesn't fit my behaviour at all. Lomax really is one of the most unpleasant and dishonest individuals I've met online


Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 22, 2020 11:21 am

A textbook case of narcissistic wounding.
Re: Handling Trolls for Fun and Profit
Post by Abd » Sat Feb 22, 2020 12:35 pm
(1) the documentation I'm referring to is not here, it is on the blog. WPO "documentation" is only readable by members there, so all those posts are being copied to my user space on wikitop.cc (where any user could do the same, absent objection).
(2) what is here is commentary on the situation and what is called "philosophy."
(3) Obviously, boredbird doesn't like it. This troll is invited to not read it.
(4) Yes, I'm calling boredbird a troll, because that is how is posts are appearing. The topic here is how to handle trolls. What he just posted is a claim that what I'm doing is unnecessary, since redundant. But the documentation pages are just that, and do not include response or my commentary (generally).
(5) So boredbird doesn't like being called a troll? Consider that, on Reddit, I'm being called "short eyes." I was a prison chaplain, but that term never came up. It means "pedophile," and call someone in the prison environment "short eyes," you are saying that they should be killed. Peope are actually murdered because of accusations of pedophilia.
(6) So in a context where the most extreme epithets are being routinely applied, a minor one like "troll" -- which I've very often been called when there was no justification -- raises boredbird's dander. Troll.
(7) But I have not yet concluded "troll" with sufficient clarity to stop responding to him (and I might move trollposts simply on that basis. When a user starts posting with a trolling motive, it's offensive to the site, not just against the person.)
The idea that trolling is entertaining, I am directly confronting. It's toxic, in general. I've given what are rare examples where trolling can be maintained with justice.
Because this maintains relevance, I'm not moving it. The distinction between defensive reaction and documentation -- which is undeniable fact -- is important to what I'm suggesting. Allowing the community to defend, if defense is appropriate, is very important to it. And, little by little, the community is defending.
"I don't like you politely questioning me, so you are a troll."
It's hard to read this screeching as anything but a wounded animal lashing out in terror and rage.

Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 22, 2020 2:22 pm

The sucks brain trust hard at work
Rocket surgeons, every one.

Post by TotalWar » Sat Feb 22, 2020 2:36 pm

I'm not sure why Lomax is copying all the replies made here to a wiki:
https://wikitop.cc/w/User:Abd/Wikipedio ... 0_11:09_am
Lomax spent hours going through my internet history looking to find any spat/feud/disagreement I've had online with people; he found two such individuals:
1. Michael Coombs - a self-described Nazi
2. Emil Kirkegaard - a self-described eugenicist
He now uses Wikipedia Sucks to defend these two people while attacking me. Basically, to him: enemy of my enemy is my friend. However, this doesn't look good when the people he's defending are morally objectionable Nazis and eugenicists. He should just stop what he's doing. :blink:

Post by Giraffe Stapler » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:26 pm

Reposting content from the members-only forums is definitely against the terms of use.
Zoloft wrote:
Addition to TOS:
Members are required to keep confidential the contents of forums which are not in public view, including all members-only forums. Failure to do so may involve restrictions on viewing that content, or suspension of the member’s account.

Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:37 pm

Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:26 pm
[quoted in toto]
Rules are for little people

Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:39 pm

Like clockwork
Abd has NPD wrote:
Symptoms
Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and the severity of symptoms vary. People with the disorder can:

  • Have an exaggerated sense of self-importance
  • Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration
  • Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it
  • Exaggerate achievements and talents
  • Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate
  • Believe they are superior and can only associate with equally special people
  • Monopolize conversations and belittle or look down on people they perceive as inferior
  • Expect special favors and unquestioning compliance with their expectations
  • Take advantage of others to get what they want
  • Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others
  • Be envious of others and believe others envy them
  • Behave in an arrogant or haughty manner, coming across as conceited, boastful and pretentious

Seek treatment, Dennis.
Time is running out wrote:
At the same time, people with narcissistic personality disorder have trouble handling anything they perceive as criticism, and they can:

  • Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special treatment
  • Have significant interpersonal problems and easily feel slighted
  • React with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make themselves appear superior
  • Have difficulty regulating emotions and behavior
  • Experience major problems dealing with stress and adapting to change
  • Feel depressed and moody because they fall short of perfection
  • Have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation

Or not....
:popcorn:

Post by Giraffe Stapler » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:49 pm

Vigilant wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:37 pm
Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:26 pm
Reposting content from the members-only forums is definitely against the terms of use.
Zoloft wrote:
Addition to TOS:
Members are required to keep confidential the contents of forums which are not in public view, including all members-only forums. Failure to do so may involve restrictions on viewing that content, or suspension of the member’s account.
Rules are for little people
I just wanted to see if he would post it on his archive or if he is picking and choosing which ones to post and which ones to omit because they make him look bad. Surely Abd wouldn't do that, though?

Post by Vigilant » Sat Feb 22, 2020 6:03 pm

Giraffe Stapler wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:49 pm
[quoted in toto]
Image Time to spin the wheel of porn

Post by Midsize Jake » Sat Feb 22, 2020 9:10 pm

From his latest comment on their thread about ham radio that he's somehow managed to hijack into being about himself:
Abd on WikipediaSucks wrote:
Zoloft objected to "private" material being copied. But it is not really private if any registered user can see it.
Um, no. We have about 850 unbanned registered users, roughly 250 of which have visited recently enough to have seen this thread. My guess is that about 20 percent of them have actually read some of it, so that's about 50 people, only one of whom — Abd himself — has taken the trouble to reproduce it elsewhere.
Meanwhile, the number of people who have internet access on this planet is roughly 3,500,000,000, all of whom can read all of their threads about us, most of which are far more inflammatory than this thread is, whenever they want. And yet, still no one, here or anywhere else, has bothered to reproduce any of them (at least not verbatim) on a separate website. It's funny how they can produce a entire forum full of publicly-visible, mostly-dishonest invective about this site and hear nary a peep about it, but when we open just one little thread about them in a private forum here, they all literally lose their collective shit.
I should add that reproducing any posts from here, public or private, in such a way is also a violation of copyright. As I've already informed him via an e-mail (which he apparently ignored), his claims of "fair use" in this regard are both specious and absurd.
On a fundamental level, his actions are those of an extremely irresponsible, immature, narcissistic, and possibly even criminally-minded individual.
So, I would like to again remind Mr. Abd that his brain is severely defective and that he should go and have sex with himself immediately.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:09 am

You'd think that a guy with this many red links would find more time to work on his project and less time to bloviate.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:26 pm

Post by Vigilant » Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:34 pm

Post by Vigilant » Wed Feb 26, 2020 2:04 pm

Post by Vigilant » Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:55 pm

The spittle driven mechanism grinds suddenly to a halt, its multitude of tinker built arms oscillating with the sudden change in momentum.
Perhaps the autistic squirrel in the cage at the center of the machine has decided to study something else shiny and dumb?

Post by Midsize Jake » Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:26 pm

Vigilant wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:55 pm
The spittle driven mechanism grinds suddenly to a halt, its multitude of tinker built arms oscillating with the sudden change in momentum.
Lull periods do happen... it could be their attention has been grabbed by the Coronavirus/Trumpvirus COVID-19 news over the last couple of days. Or, it could be that they were all so stunned by Abd's astonishingly misinformed and self-contradictory defense of his own abuse of our copyrights that they all just couldn't deal with it, at least for the time being.
And just for his further edification, yes, our members hold the direct copyright on all their posts, but the site has a semi-exclusive license to publish those posts, and that's a license which we do not routinely relinquish to third parties — I don't think we ever have done so, in fact. (By "semi-exclusive" I mean that a poster can reproduce his/her own posts elsewhere, along with other posts with permission of the other poster(s), but nobody else.) Practically all internet forums operate under this same principle, which Mr. Abd clearly either doesn't understand or doesn't give a shit about. So yes, if I were a member of WikipediaSucks and I saw this happening and being done by a moderator, I would cease participation there immediately, or at the very least I would think long and hard about submitting another post there until the situation is resolved.

Post by Vigilant » Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:16 am

Post by Randy from Boise » Sun Mar 01, 2020 12:16 pm

Midsize Jake wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:26 pm
Lull periods do happen...
Sucks under Master Super Moderator Abd moves from lull periods to lol periods seamlessly.

Post by Vigilant » Sun Mar 01, 2020 1:42 pm

Only Abd can fix it!
Narcissistic_personality_disorder (T-H-L) [Wikipedia article]
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5, 2013) indicates that a person with NPD possesses at least five of the following nine criteria, typically without possessing the commensurate personal qualities or accomplishments for which they demand respect and status:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder
*Grandiosity with expectations of superior treatment from other people
*Continually demeaning, bullying and belittling others
*Exploiting others to achieve personal gain
*Lack of empathy for the negative impact they have on the feelings, wishes, and needs of other people
*Fixation on fantasies of power, success, intelligence, attractiveness, etc.
*Self-perception of being unique, superior, and associated with high-status people and institutions
*Need for continual admiration from others
*Sense of entitlement to special treatment and to obedience from others
*Intense envy of others, and the belief that others are equally envious of them
How many criteria does Abd fit?
Does any of the below sound familiar with Abd?
Associated features
People with NPD exaggerate their skills, accomplishments, and their degree of intimacy with people they consider high-status. Such a sense of personal superiority may cause them to monopolize conversations,[10] or to become impatient and disdainful when other persons talk about themselves.[7] When wounded in the ego, either by a real or a perceived criticism, the narcissist's displays of anger can be disproportionate to the nature of the criticism suffered;[10] but typically, the actions and responses of the NPD person are deliberate and calculated.[7] Despite occasional flare-ups of personal insecurity, the inflated self-concept of the NPD person is primarily stable.[7]
To the extent that people are pathologically narcissistic, the person with NPD can be a self-absorbed control freak who passes blame and is intolerant of contradictory views and opinions; is apathetic towards the emotional, mental, and psychological needs of other people; and is indifferent to the negative effects of his or her behaviors, whilst insisting that people see him or her as an ideal person.[7] To protect their fragile self-concept, narcissists use psycho-social strategies, such as the tendency to devalue and derogate and to insult and blame other people, usually with anger and hostility towards people's responses to the narcissist's anti-social conduct.[11] Because their fragile egos are hypersensitive to perceived criticism or defeat, people with NPD are prone to feelings of shame, humiliation, and worthlessness over minor incidents of daily life and imagined, personal slights,[10] and usually mask such feelings from people, either by way of feigned humility, or by socially isolating themselves, or by responding with outbursts of rage and defiance, or by seeking revenge.[7][8] The merging of the inflated self-concept and the actual self is evident in the grandiosity component of narcissistic personality disorder; also inherent to that psychological process are the defense mechanisms of idealization and devaluation and of denial.

Post by Randy from Boise » Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:49 pm

Vigilant wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 1:42 pm
Narcissistic_personality_disorder (T-H-L)
[first section of above article quoted in toto]
ATTACHMENTS
BiggusDickus.png [image of Trump]

Post by tarantino » Tue Mar 03, 2020 7:57 pm

Abd isn't a mod there anymore, so at least they've got that going for them.

Post by Vigilant » Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:59 pm

tarantino wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 7:57 pm
Abd isn't a mod there anymore, so at least they've got that going for them.
Well, that didn't take long.
*sigh*
Just when he had me all boxed in and defeated too.
I suspect strongly that Abd will take the removal of 'rights' as a personal insult and go off the deep end, yet again.

Post by Vigilant » Wed Mar 04, 2020 11:23 am

Looks like Abd is off doing useless work on wikitop.cc.
Covering the Merkey saga and trying to revile me at the same time.
In a LOT OF WAYS, Abd reminds me of a dumber, less savvy Jeff Merkey.
There's

  • the obvious NPD
  • the lawsuits
  • the tinpot dictator behavior
  • getting kicked out of every forum they join
  • the righteous ridicule
  • the tall tales
  • the silly and obviously false claims about their awesome innate intellect
  • the voluminous pretend accomplishments
  • the utter lack of self awareness
  • the picking of opponents well beyond their capability to handle
  • the rage quits and fanciful retelling of recent history